Blog

  • What You Can Run on a DGX Spark Today (Mid-2026)

    What You Can Run on a DGX Spark Today (Mid-2026)

    This week, a wave of open-source recipes and community benchmarks clarified what the deskside AI inference market can do in mid-2026 — specifically, what fits on a single or paired NVIDIA DGX Spark, and where the GB300-based DGX Station picks up later this year. As firms such as 650 Group have been tracking in their AI inference research, the number of usable, public configurations for running capable models on consumer-class hardware has reached a level we haven’t seen before.

    NVIDIA DGX Spark

    Source: NVIDIA Newsroom

    The DGX Spark is a $4,000 deskside system powered by NVIDIA’s GB10 Grace Blackwell Superchip (140W SoC TDP, 240W system power supply, 128 GB unified memory). The product has been shipping since early 2026 through NVIDIA and channel partners, and the open-source community has now had enough time with the hardware to produce reproducible, benchmarked recipes. This is what they’ve shown.

    Single DGX Spark: What Fits, and How Fast

    The best benchmark we found came from a community-run suite called Spark-Bench, which evaluates models across 74 scenarios in 11 domains with deterministic grading — no LLM-judge, just unit tests, JSON schema validation, executable code tests, and pixel-based visual analysis. It tracks TrueScore (quality-weighted throughput) alongside raw tok/s.

    On a single Spark, the top-ranked model as of this week is Qwopus 27B (AWQ) at TrueScore 89.1, followed by Agents A1 (NVFP4) at 88.1, and Qwen 3.6-35B in various configurations (NVFP4 with DFlash, MTP-3, or UD-Q8) scoring 86.6–87.5. For reference, Grok 4.5 via cloud API scored 82.6 on the same benchmark (with low-effort settings). The Spark’s ~128 GB unified memory (≈121 GiB usable) accommodates 27B–35B parameter models comfortably at NVFP4 precision, which is the format NVIDIA has optimized for Blackwell hardware.

    The most striking throughput data point came from independent benchmarks of Qwen 3.6-35B (a 35B-A3B MoE model) running on a single Spark. The results showed 64 concurrent users served at over 700 tok/s aggregate, with nvidia-smi reporting the GPU drawing approximately 38W during sustained inference. The full benchmark suite is on GitHub, covering 57 scenarios across 10 domains with partial-credit grading and K=2 repetition per run. Total system power at the wall under similar loads typically ranges from 60–90W, with peaks under 200W (the system ships with a 240W USB-PD power supply). For enterprise edge deployments and campus AI networking use cases where a device needs to serve dozens of users without dedicated cooling, these are the first real numbers we’ve seen.

    Unsloth released new dynamic NVFP4 quantizations of Qwen 3.6 on July 10 that run 2.5x faster than NVIDIA’s reference NVFP4 quants, using a full W4A4 matrix multiply path rather than W4A16. The 27B variant fits in 24 GB VRAM (single-Spark territory), and the 35B-A3B “Fast” variant reached 17,561 tok/s on a B200-class GPU. The models are on Hugging Face, and the release thread from Unsloth’s co-founder — an ex-NVIDIA engineer who built the company’s custom Triton kernels — includes a 2h42m technical walkthrough.

    Two DGX Sparks: Chaining for Larger Models

    Two DGX Sparks at roughly $8,000 total can serve DeepSeek-V4-Flash with a 1M token context at 60+ tok/s. The recipe is on GitHub, including an abliterated (uncensored) variant that achieves 55–60 tok/s on the same hardware. For organizations that cannot send sensitive legal, financial, or medical data to cloud APIs, this price point is worth evaluating.

    A second double-Spark config runs GLM 5.2, demonstrated by a community contributor earlier this week.

    The Configuration Tuning Story That Matters More Than Specs

    The most instructive result we saw this week is how much performance is left on the table with default vLLM settings. A community contributor published the full DGX Spark recipe for Nemotron Puzzle 75B-A9B at NVFP4 precision on GitHub. At stock configuration, a single Spark delivered roughly 40 tok/s for a single stream, with max_num_seqs=1 meaning four parallel requests were serialized — one at a time, the rest queued. After changing max_num_seqs to 4 and enabling prefix caching, the same hardware achieved 75 tok/s aggregate across four parallel streams.

    The honest assessment from the recipe’s README: “the big win is concurrency + prefix cache, not a free jump in solo tok/s.” The system’s MTP-3 speculative decoding acceptance was already healthy at ~75% draft tokens. What the config change unlocked was multi-stream capacity. This matters for agent-based workloads where multiple simultaneous outputs (tool calls, sub-tasks) are the norm, not a burst scenario.

    Infrastructure Layer Updates

    NVIDIA’s ModelOpt 0.45.0 release continues the trend of bringing enterprise-scale models down to consumer hardware through automated quantization and optimization pipelines. The company has published a detailed comparison of NVFP4 versus MXFP4 4-bit formats running GPT-OSS-120B on Blackwell, covering quantization accuracy, throughput, and hardware compatibility — a useful reference for anyone choosing a quantization target for production deployment.

    On the inference engine side, DFlash speculative decoding was recently merged into llama.cpp (PR #22105, merged 2 weeks ago). DFlash produces an entire block of candidate tokens in a single draft forward pass, unlike EAGLE3’s autoregressive one-by-one draft. Benchmarks on Qwen3.6-27B show 3.2x–4.9x decode speedups on structured coding tasks, with the PR authors reporting up to 8x on ideal Qwen3 configurations. The Spark-Bench leaderboard already lists a DFlash-k10 variant of Qwen 3.6-35B at TrueScore 87.2, confirming it works on the GB10 hardware.

    Where This Goes: DGX Station GB300

    NVIDIA DGX Station for Windows

    Source: NVIDIA Newsroom

    In Q4 2026, NVIDIA’s GB300 Grace Blackwell Ultra Desktop Superchip enters the picture through partner systems branded as DGX Station. The spec sheet: 748 GB of coherent memory (252 GB HBM3e GPU at 7.1 TB/s + 496 GB LPDDR5X CPU at 396 GB/s), 20 petaFLOPS FP4, 72-core Grace CPU, 1,600W power delivery, and support for models up to 1 trillion parameters. Systems are orderable now from ASUS, Dell, GIGABYTE, HP, MSI, and Supermicro, with pricing from partners like Bizon starting at $108,159 and shipping in the September–November range. The full press release is on NVIDIA’s news site.

    The implication is straightforward: the recipes being built and shared for GB10 this week will be directly applicable to GB300 deployments this year, running models 10–30x larger on the same desk footprint.

  • How to Connect Arlo Pro4 to Google Wi-Fi (the 2.4 GHz problem)

    To get a Pro4 to connect to Google Wi-Fi, you must connect your iPhone or Android to the same access point, both using 2.4 GHz. Sounds easy, but using Google Wi-Fi, this capability does not exist.

    Therefore, here is what you must do.

    • Disconnect all but one Google Wi-Fi. This is a temporary measure; you’ll turn plug them back in later.
    • Force 2.4 GHz mode. Since Google Wi-Fi (the 802.11ac Wave 1 version) does not allow you to specify that you must connect using 2.4 GHz. Searching through the support pages for Google Wi-Fi, it has a “hint” that says is you move far enough away from your Google Wi-Fi device, you’ll eventually get too far away that it connects using 5 GHz and it’ll switch over to 2.4 GHz. The way to make sure you’re connecting to 2.4 GHz is to switch over to the Google Home application, click on Devices, find your iPhone (or Android), click Info and see if it says 2.4 GHz or 5 GHz. Keep moving away from your only working Google Wi-Fi device until you connect to 2.4 GHz.
    • Disable VPN and related blockers. I use the Lockdown VPN application. You must disconnect from VPNs because the requirement for the Arlo app is that you are connected to the “same” network. If you have a VPN or NAT on, you’ll be connecting to a different network.
    • Now follow the directions on your Arlo app. Go to Devices, scroll to the bottom to +Add Devices. Follow the steps, with blue blinking lights, QR codes, then the find function.

    Now, plug in all your Google Wi-Fi devices and your Arlo Pro4 should be working.

  • Why you shouldn’t get your news from Facebook

    Yes, this article has a sensational title, saying that you shouldn’t get your news from Facebook.  You’d have to be a fool to believe the opinions of your former classmates, or worse, the views of people you don’t even know, or still worse, to believe advertisements or apparent news stories on a site like Facebook.  The point of this article, though, is that by not editing its content, or, at least making sure that the advertisements and posts on its site aren’t destructive, Facebook has set itself up for government intervention.  It is sad, really, because Facebook’s users should damn well know better that the advertisements and posts can be garbage, biased, or false.  But, who said most voters are smart?

    Just like when sell side analysts were blamed for the Internet stock craze in the 1990’s, mom and pop investors should have known better to listen to these analysts spouting their views to the media – views, by the way, they didn’t pay for – but they didn’t.  Then the government intervened, threatening investment banks to change their ways.  And over time, much as a result of this debacle, budgets for sell side research has been decimated.

    Companies have to do a good job of making sure they don’t hurt the public, regardless of the rules currently in place.  When people get hurt, the public look back on the actions of companies and lay judgement on past actions.  I take heart in the idea that some companies are quite moral.  Take for example, when just before the Great Recession of 2008, Mr. Ford, then then CEO of Ford, made the decision to no longer create gas-guzzling Expeditions and embarked on a program to make aluminum-based frames for the most popular truck in the US – the F150 – to save on fuel costs.  I look back at this as a very moral – and smart move.  And when the recession hit, demand for Ford products were slightly higher than for Chrysler and Chevy products, and Ford didn’t need a bailout like General Motors and didn’t have to get acquired like Chrysler.  History judges.

    Back to Facebook, it is now clear that the Russian Federation posted stories to Facebook in a likely successful attempt to change the outcome of the 2016 US Presidential election.  Consider that there are spies all around the world, using old style methods of information gathering and influence peddling. It should be no secret that each country intends to learn about their allies and enemies and pursue covert activities to influence events to improve that country’s plight.

    Remember how upset Germany was with the US when the Snowden information revealed that US was tapping phone calls made by German PM Angela Merkel?  She and other German authorities were very upset with the US and took diplomatic actions and put into place information privacy laws that would subtly change the influence US companies would have in Germany – and therefore the European Union.  This has had a chilling effect on US interests in Europe.

    I think it would be reasonable to expect the US to penalize Russia for its influencing of the US 2016 election.  But how?

    • The US Government can ask nicely.  That won’t work, so long as the US continues to attempt to influence policies of other countries.
    • The US can put up electronic barriers between Russia and the US.  That won’t work because of the structure of the Internet today.  To change the Internet’s architecture would be detrimental to US interests.
    • The US could require US-based news agencies – and social media – to police their content.  That will backfire and would almost certainly change the advertising industry and potentially infringe on free speech.

    Or, the US can rely on self-policing by the social media giants themselves.  Google, Facebook, Twitter, Reddit and all the others had better hurry up and fix this.

  • Difference between 1156 and 1167 auto bulbs – know this and save $6!!!

    I have an old 1991 Toyota pickup.  Love this reliable truck.  The left rear brake light stopped working and needed replacement.  I of course went to amazon.com because I like prime shipping and wanted the light as soon as possible without having to drive to the local auto parts store.  I typed in the search bar: “rear brake light 1991 toyota pickup” and quickly ordered a Phillips Long Lasting 1156 bulb.  I checked to see if this fit the 1991 using the Amazon garage feature, and it said “this product fits these positions in your 1991 Toyota Pickup: *rear  *front.”

    The 1156 bulb arrived promptly two days later and I went to install it – Oh no, it wasn’t the right one!!!  I needed the one with two electrical connectors on the bottom (1157), not just one (1156).

    Here is the difference between a 1157 (click on the rockauto.com link for a typical 1157) and a 1156 bulb (see picture below):

    Philips 1156LL bulb
    Philips 1156LL bulb

    Well, I just ordered a Phillips 1157 LL from Amazon and it’ll get here in a couple days. This is the one I should have gotten!

     

    We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

  • My experience in upgrading to Google WiFi

    I recently upgraded my home network to Google Wifi system (set of 3) and have had a positive experience. My previous setup was an Apple Airport Extreme with one Netgear 2.4 Ghz extender and a two TP Link extenders. In trying to decipher why the performance improved, I reviewed several aspects of the old network and compare them to the new network.  Two major things improved:  improved use of 5 Ghz spectrum (which has far more channels than 2.4 Ghz to chose from) and better reach.

    According to market research companies like 650 Group, Consumer Mesh WLAN is taking share from the older technology like Consumer Routers.

    Old Network.

    Router: Apple Airport Exteme, which is a 802.11ac Wave 1 consumer router.  This has a very nice user interface for my iPhone 6.  However, if you click on the link for the Airport, you’ll see that this is a refurbished unit.  That’s because Apple exited the WiFi router market in November 2016.

    Extender: TP-Link N300 Wi-Fi range Extender (Tl-WA855RE), which is a very affordable device, which I purchased for $14.99.  I see it sells for $22.99 today, though.  This device is a 802.11n device, operating only at 2.4 Ghz.  For me, I found it relatively easy to set up.

    Extender: TP-Link AC750 (RE2000), which sells for $24.99 today.  I bought it earlier in 2017 for $29.99.  This product didn’t seem to have as good a range as the N300 above.

    Netgear WN2500RP Dual Band, which sells for $39.99 today.  I bought this a long time ago and cannot remember when.

    Generally, this network had about 15-18 devices on it at any given time, including a Tivo that used an 802.11g adapter, a chromecast, an Apple TV, an Amazon stick, several iPhones (like 4-5), a Moto Android, several ooma phone adapters (3 in total), two iPads, 2 Windows machines, a Mac desktop, a Macbook Pro, a chromebook, two Arlo Pros (these cameras are the best I’ve ever had, and they had 30 day battery life), and for my Husky mutt dog, a Whistle 3 (recommended for finding your dog when he/she runs away).

    The old system would experience frequent outages when everyone would come home. Basically, the devices furthest from the main router would experience outages frequently.  Over time, this got worse and worse as my family would use more and more video.  Also, for a variety of reasons, I had three different SSIDs, which meant devices on the move would have to reconnect – this is awful because devices don’t always connect as soon as they should and then you cannot communicate to the network.

    New system.

    So, I bought the Google WiFi 3 pack for $279.99.  This was more affordable than more well known hardware brands like Netgear, Linksys, as well as the innovator in this market, eero.  Frankly, I would have trusted any of these four brands, but the Google price was more than $100 less, so I went for it.

    Installation was very, very easy and consisted of downloading an IOS app, scanning a QR code, plugging in the first device, cycling my cable modem and waiting a bit.  Then I plugged in the other two devices, and they just worked.  The app shows very useful usage statistics, like what frequency each device is operating on (2.4 or 5 Ghz), what total network bandwidth (up and downstream) is being used, how much bandwidth each device is using.  Additionally, the software can tell you if each of the routers is placed too far away.  Basically, this is a well thought out system that works much better than my old router + extender network.  It allows me to operate 18-20 devices constantly with no interruptions so far.  I’m very pleased.

    We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

  • New FCC policymaker speaks

    Ajit Pai is the new US FCC Chairman.  He spoke at the Mobile World Congress show in late February 2017 and made comments that set him apart from his predecessor.

    He argued that the FCC will be pragmatic and pursue policies that accelerate broadband deployment.  Short-term, we do think that the new chairman’s stance will encourage capital spending by US communications providers.  Longer-term, it is unclear – especially in light of the fact that FCC chairs don’t last forever because they are political appointees of the President.  Pai is Trump’s appointee.

    He was asked about his stance on consolidation in the US telecommunications market and said he cannot give a blanket statement about how the FCC will view M&A; instead he said each deal is reviewed uniquely and the FCC will take in mind what is expected to happen at that time.  We expect this new chairman will be more permissive of M&A, however.

  • 650 Group – new market research company

    A new market research firm created by Chris DePuy and Alan Weckel is called 650 Group.  The company covers WLAN, Ethernet switching, Telecom Core, NFV, and other markets.

  • Hello world!

    Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!